To compare intrapartum cardiotocographic (CTG) recording with conventional intermittent fetal heart auscultation during labor

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Sep 30, 2014
DOI https://doi.org/10.30750/ijpbr.2.3.12

Main Article Content

Isha Bansal
Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
Richa Kansal
Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
R. Mahendru
Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
Sunita Siwach
Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
Deepak Singla
Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
Manjeet Singh
Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India

Abstract

Standard evaluation of fetal well-being during labor includes the periodic assessment of the fetal heart rate (FHR), its pattern and response to intrapartum stimuli and events. Effective methods of evaluation and meaningful interpretation of FHR data range from non-invasive techniques like Intermittent Auscultation, continuous electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring to invasive techniques of fetal blood gas analysis and fetal ECG.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Bansal I, Kansal R, Mahendru R, Siwach S, Singla D, Singh M. To compare intrapartum cardiotocographic (CTG) recording with conventional intermittent fetal heart auscultation during labor. IJPBR [Internet]. 30Sep.2014 [cited 11Jul.2025];2(03):76-9. Available from: https://www.ijpbr.in/index.php/IJPBR/article/view/846
Issue
Vol 2 No 03 (2014): Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research
Section
Table of Content
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.